Power optimizers v. microinverters: What’s different about these approaches to PV architecture?

microinvertersThere are three main types of inverter topologies currently used in PV systems: traditional string inverters, microinverters and power optimizers. Since the traditional string inverter topology has a number of significant drawbacks, the industry is moving forward to distributed PV system architecture. The two leading technologies for distributed PV system architecture are DC power optimizers and microinverters.

DC power optimizers and microinverters are often mistaken for being the same technology since they both offer increased power generation, module-level monitoring, more flexible design and enhanced safety compared to traditional string inverters. While both of these technologies are types of distributed PV system architecture that overcome the shortcomings of traditional inverters by placing hardware at the module level, their approach to the distribution of the PV components is very different.

RELATED: Next-gen microinverters: Ramping up reliability, power, storage options 

Microinverter technology was introduced in the ‘90s. This topology takes the functionality of the traditional string inverter and scales it down to fit a single module. By controlling each module individually, microinverters are able to solve certain challenges of the traditional system. But microinverters will not benefit every installation. This topology requires each module to have its own microinverter with full inverter functionality.

Therefore, it generally has significantly higher upfront costs relative to traditional inverter topology. This means that microinverter systems can lack scalability for large residential systems and typically are not economically viable for larger commercial and utility installations. In addition, many microinverters can face grid code compliance challenges.

DC OptimizersPower optimizers were introduced in 2006 and unlike microinverters, power optimizers keep the DC/AC inversion at the inverter-level and only distribute the MPPT functionality to the module level. This allows power optimizers to provide module-level tracking and real-time adjustments of current and voltage to the optimal working point of each individual module.

The inverter, which remains at the string level, is now only responsible for DC-AC inversion and grid connection. By not duplicating the inverter function to the module level, power optimizers are known for their reliability, scalablility and lower cost per watt.

RELATED: DC optimizer advocates: HDPV Alliance adds 14 big names to member ranks 

While power optimizers and microinverters are both distributed PV system architecture technology, their method to achieve the distribution is very different. These differences account for important advantages and disadvantages to PV systems. In the past few years, as providers enhance their performance capabilities and cost structures for residential, commercial roof-top and ground-mount PV fields, power optimizers have shown significant market growth.

Listen to more in-depth conversations on Solar Builder's YouTube channel

Our most popular series include:

Power Forward! | A collaboration with BayWa r.e. to discuss higher level industry topics.
The Buzz | Where we give our 2 cents per kWh on the residential solar market.
The Pitch | Discussions with solar manufacturers about their new technology and ideas.

Tags: , , ,